Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orzhov Pixie | pokerswizard | 5-2 | None |
| Orzhov Pixie | pokerswizard | 5-2 | None |
| kingofallyousee | 4-2 | None | |
| Orzhov Pixie | pokerswizard | 3-3 | None |
| Orzhov Pixie | arunninghans | 2-4 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Dimir Bounce , Dimir Mill , Esper Pixie , Orzhov Pixie , Unclassified
Meta Performance Analysis
Wishclaw Talisman ranks #225 out of approximately 409 cards in raw efficiency (top 55%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 73.0%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Wishclaw Talisman is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 0.00 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.5%. Wishclaw Talisman has a win rate of 59.4%, making it 20.3% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gold Pan | Artifact — Equipment | 5 | 60.0% | 0 |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 5 | 58.6% | 0 |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 9 | 57.9% | 1 |
| Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 5 | 51.9% | 0 |
| Grim Bauble | Artifact | 6 | 51.4% | 0 |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 18 | 48.0% | 1 |
| Loran of the Third Path | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 13 | 46.9% | 0 |
| Nurturing Pixie | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 18 | 45.2% | 1 |
| Clay-Fired Bricks | Artifact // Artifact | 10 | 42.1% | 0 |
| Nowhere to Run | Enchantment | 21 | 41.6% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Wishclaw Talisman than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scrollshift | Instant | 3 | 5 | 59.4% | 61.0% | -1.6% |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 4 | 5 | 61.5% | 66.5% | -5.0% |
| Grim Bauble | Artifact | 1 | 5 | 60.5% | 65.7% | -5.2% |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 2 | 5 | 59.4% | 64.8% | -5.5% |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 5 | 59.4% | 64.9% | -5.5% |
| Nurturing Pixie | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 1 | 5 | 59.4% | 65.0% | -5.6% |
| Momentum Breaker | Enchantment | 2 | 5 | 59.4% | 65.2% | -5.8% |
| Nowhere to Run | Enchantment | 2 | 5 | 59.4% | 65.4% | -6.1% |
| Hopeless Nightmare | Enchantment | 1 | 5 | 59.4% | 65.7% | -6.3% |
| Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 3 | 5 | 59.4% | 66.2% | -6.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 17 | 1.1% | 42.5% |
| Orzhov Pixie | 5 | 6.9% | 45.2% |
| Unclassified | 3 | 1.5% | 47.1% |
| 1 | 1.6% | 66.7% | |
| Dimir Bounce | 1 | 0.2% | 0.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.