Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Orzhov Pixie | rushi_00 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Orzhov Pixie | pokerswizard | 5-2 | None |
kingofallyousee | 4-2 | None | |
Orzhov Pixie | msmayer | 4-2 | None |
Orzhov Pixie | limetrout | 4-3 | None |
4 Color Blink , Abzan Beanstalk , Azorius Auras , Azorius Control , Bant Beanstalk , Boros Discover , Boros Tokens Control , Domain Overlords , Domain Zur Overlords
Scrollshift ranks #310 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 76%).
White average: 74.9%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Scrollshift is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 1.79 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.6%. Scrollshift has a win rate of 59.0%, making it 19.8% worse than other 3-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Clifftop Lookout | Creature — Frog Scout | 5 | 80.0% | 4 |
Pillage the Bog | Sorcery | 6 | 78.6% | 4 |
Starfall Invocation | Sorcery | 6 | 77.8% | 4 |
Defiled Crypt/Cadaver Lab | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 16 | 77.5% | 6 |
Spiteful Hexmage | Creature — Human Warlock | 14 | 75.2% | 5 |
Shrouded Shepherd | Creature — Spirit Warrior // Sorcery — Adventure | 14 | 71.7% | 5 |
Llanowar Elves | Creature — Elf Druid | 6 | 70.6% | 3 |
Fear of Isolation | Enchantment Creature — Nightmare | 20 | 69.8% | 7 |
Seized from Slumber | Instant | 32 | 69.7% | 17 |
Thrun, Breaker of Silence | Legendary Creature — Troll Shaman | 6 | 67.3% | 2 |
Cards that perform better with Scrollshift than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 1 | 7 | 65.9% | 65.1% | +0.8% |
Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 8 | 63.5% | 65.0% | -1.5% |
Grim Bauble | Artifact | 1 | 10 | 61.4% | 64.5% | -3.1% |
Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 2 | 10 | 60.0% | 64.4% | -4.4% |
Loran of the Third Path | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 3 | 8 | 59.2% | 63.7% | -4.5% |
Nurturing Pixie | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 1 | 11 | 59.0% | 63.7% | -4.7% |
Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 9 | 60.0% | 64.7% | -4.7% |
Hopeless Nightmare | Enchantment | 1 | 10 | 59.6% | 64.5% | -4.9% |
Momentum Breaker | Enchantment | 2 | 11 | 59.0% | 64.0% | -5.0% |
Nowhere to Run | Enchantment | 2 | 11 | 58.8% | 64.4% | -5.6% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Domain Zur Overlords | 171 | 13.1% | 50.8% |
Esper Pixie | 41 | 2.6% | 53.8% |
Orzhov Pixie | 15 | 22.1% | 39.5% |
Abzan Beanstalk | 8 | 23.5% | 74.0% |
Esper Paragon | 8 | 44.4% | 38.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.