Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Oculus | jussupinator | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Jeskai Oculus | cabezadebolo | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Jeskai Oculus | markeltxu11 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Mono Black Demons | brunoprince | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Jeskai Oculus | friskifraska | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Flash , Azorius Omniscience , Azorius Synthesizer , Boros Forge , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Midrange , Dimir Repurposing
Meta Performance Analysis
The Filigree Sylex ranks #161 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 40%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 65.4%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, The Filigree Sylex is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 26.87 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.7%. The Filigree Sylex has a win rate of 75.2%, making it 2.1% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with The Filigree Sylex than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marauding Mako | Creature — Shark Pirate | 1 | 7 | 87.2% | 78.2% | +9.0% |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 3 | 8 | 84.4% | 76.1% | +8.3% |
| Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 10 | 83.6% | 76.2% | +7.4% |
| Glacial Dragonhunt | Sorcery | 2 | 8 | 84.4% | 78.5% | +6.0% |
| Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 9 | 77.5% | 73.2% | +4.3% |
| Destroy Evil | Instant | 2 | 16 | 77.3% | 74.3% | +3.0% |
| Torch the Tower | Instant | 1 | 14 | 77.5% | 75.2% | +2.3% |
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 15 | 77.5% | 75.3% | +2.2% |
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 1 | 15 | 76.6% | 75.7% | +0.9% |
| Recommission | Sorcery | 2 | 14 | 77.5% | 78.0% | -0.5% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Oculus | 133 | 49.3% | 49.5% |
| Dimir Midrange | 46 | 2.2% | 27.3% |
| Golgari Midrange | 35 | 4.5% | 46.9% |
| Dimir Bounce | 23 | 4.7% | 34.6% |
| Mono Black Demons | 19 | 19.4% | 41.4% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.