Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Oculus | phoenix_flame | 7-2 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | thief_of_crowns | 6-2 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | sixmp | 6-3 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | thief_of_crowns | 6-3 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Tempo , Bant Tempo , Boros Monument , Boros Recommission , Esper Oculus , Esper Repurposing , Jeskai Equipments , Jeskai Monument , Jeskai Oculus , Mardu Monument
Meta Performance Analysis
Recommission ranks #128 out of approximately 267 cards in raw efficiency (top 48%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 63.7%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Recommission is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 17.47 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 77.3%. Recommission has a win rate of 74.0%, making it 4.2% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 5 | 80.6% | 2 |
| Duress | Sorcery | 8 | 73.5% | 3 |
| Glacial Dragonhunt | Sorcery | 47 | 71.1% | 18 |
| Winternight Stories | Sorcery | 49 | 70.6% | 18 |
| Cut Down | Instant | 6 | 70.0% | 2 |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 49 | 69.4% | 17 |
| Scorching Dragonfire | Instant | 44 | 67.0% | 16 |
| Pest Control | Sorcery | 15 | 64.1% | 5 |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 15 | 64.0% | 5 |
| Ketramose, the New Dawn | Legendary Creature — God | 6 | 63.3% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Recommission than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authority of the Consuls | Enchantment | 1 | 7 | 78.6% | 75.1% | +3.5% |
| Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 30 | 78.3% | 74.9% | +3.3% |
| The Filigree Sylex | Legendary Artifact | 2 | 8 | 75.6% | 73.3% | +2.3% |
| Marauding Mako | Creature — Shark Pirate | 1 | 33 | 74.3% | 73.2% | +1.2% |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 27 | 76.5% | 75.5% | +0.9% |
| Abhorrent Oculus | Creature — Eye | 3 | 36 | 74.0% | 73.1% | +0.9% |
| Helping Hand | Sorcery | 1 | 36 | 74.0% | 73.1% | +0.9% |
| Steamcore Scholar | Creature — Weird Detective | 3 | 35 | 74.0% | 73.1% | +0.9% |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 3 | 36 | 75.2% | 74.4% | +0.9% |
| Proft's Eidetic Memory | Legendary Enchantment | 2 | 35 | 74.0% | 73.4% | +0.6% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Tempo | 391 | 98.2% | 42.2% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 296 | 97.7% | 52.5% |
| Jeskai Monument | 28 | 90.3% | 61.9% |
| Unknown Archetype | 11 | 3.0% | 52.3% |
| Esper Oculus | 9 | 64.3% | 60.4% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.