Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sultai Dragons | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| tarkanmag | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 | |
| Jeskai Control | spyromancer | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| spyromancer | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Control , Azorius Omniscience , Grixis Dragons , Jeskai Control , Sultai Dragons
Meta Performance Analysis
Marang River Regent ranks #373 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 92%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 71.3%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Marang River Regent is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 8.19 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 6 mana, the average win rate in the format is 79.6%. Marang River Regent has a win rate of 80.4%, making it 1.1% better than other 6-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Split Up | Sorcery | 12 | 88.2% | 9 |
| Voice of Victory | Creature — Human Bard | 8 | 88.0% | 5 |
| Chandra, Hope's Beacon | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 8 | 85.8% | 4 |
| Flashfreeze | Instant | 8 | 85.8% | 4 |
| Ephara's Dispersal | Instant | 12 | 84.7% | 6 |
| Abuelo's Awakening | Sorcery | 12 | 84.5% | 6 |
| Confounding Riddle | Instant | 12 | 84.5% | 6 |
| Omniscience | Enchantment | 12 | 84.5% | 6 |
| Disenchant | Instant | 10 | 84.2% | 5 |
| Abrade | Instant | 24 | 84.2% | 15 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Marang River Regent than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 5 | 92.9% | 78.6% | +14.2% |
| Split Up | Sorcery | 3 | 12 | 88.5% | 78.8% | +9.7% |
| Change the Equation | Instant | 2 | 9 | 81.6% | 74.9% | +6.7% |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 12 | 85.7% | 79.4% | +6.3% |
| Authority of the Consuls | Enchantment | 1 | 19 | 84.4% | 79.2% | +5.1% |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 4 | 43 | 82.3% | 77.3% | +5.0% |
| Ill-Timed Explosion | Sorcery | 4 | 11 | 84.5% | 79.6% | +4.9% |
| Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 32 | 80.6% | 75.8% | +4.8% |
| Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 3 | 45 | 81.7% | 76.9% | +4.8% |
| Kutzil's Flanker | Creature — Cat Warrior | 3 | 27 | 83.8% | 79.9% | +3.9% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 30.5% | 66.9% | |
| Jeskai Control | 17 | 54.8% | 84.3% |
| Azorius Omniscience | 12 | 3.5% | 84.5% |
| Azorius Control | 5 | 1.4% | 64.8% |
| Grixis Dragons | 1 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.