Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orzhov Angels | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Omniscience | caronte1991 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Azorius Omniscience | aardos | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Azorius Omniscience | caronte1991 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Azorius Omniscience | flaviojr | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Control , Azorius Omniscience , Azorius Synthesizer , Azorius Tempo , Boros Burn , Jeskai Aggro , Jeskai Oculus , Mono White Blink , Mono White Lifegain , Mono White Tokens
Meta Performance Analysis
Disenchant ranks #133 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 33%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 74.9%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Disenchant is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 26.35 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.7%. Disenchant has a win rate of 81.1%, making it 10.0% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Disenchant than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change the Equation | Instant | 2 | 7 | 84.1% | 75.3% | +8.8% |
| Roiling Dragonstorm | Enchantment | 2 | 9 | 83.9% | 78.6% | +5.3% |
| This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 5 | 81.0% | 76.3% | +4.6% |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 4 | 11 | 81.8% | 77.6% | +4.2% |
| Get Lost | Instant | 2 | 17 | 82.2% | 78.0% | +4.2% |
| Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 3 | 19 | 80.4% | 77.2% | +3.2% |
| Voice of Victory | Creature — Human Bard | 2 | 8 | 85.7% | 82.9% | +2.8% |
| Devout Decree | Sorcery | 2 | 7 | 84.1% | 81.4% | +2.7% |
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 19 | 80.0% | 78.2% | +1.8% |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 19 | 80.0% | 78.3% | +1.7% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Omniscience | 106 | 31.4% | 49.1% |
| Unknown Archetype | 6 | 1.9% | 16.7% |
| Azorius Control | 4 | 1.1% | 34.4% |
| Orzhov Lifegain | 4 | 5.1% | 43.3% |
| Mono White Tokens | 4 | 0.7% | 14.3% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.