Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | pepeteam | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Azorius Control | dbaboon | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Esper Pixie | pietart | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Esper Pixie | taltheturtle | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Selesnya Gearhulk | kram1138 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Azorius Control , Azorius Enchantments , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph , Azorius Repurposing , Bant Gearhulk , Bant Synthesizer
Meta Performance Analysis
Wilt-Leaf Liege ranks #271 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 80%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 54.3%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Wilt-Leaf Liege is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 6.14 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 68.6%. Wilt-Leaf Liege has a win rate of 68.0%, making it 0.9% worse than other 4-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insidious Fungus | Creature — Fungus | 5 | 77.4% | 1 |
| Novice Inspector | Creature — Human Detective | 5 | 77.3% | 2 |
| Mockingbird | Creature — Bird Bard | 8 | 65.2% | 4 |
| Not on My Watch | Instant | 5 | 64.8% | 0 |
| Tender Wildguide | Creature — Possum Druid | 6 | 61.8% | 1 |
| Unidentified Hovership | Artifact — Vehicle | 9 | 57.5% | 2 |
| Exorcise | Sorcery | 7 | 57.0% | 2 |
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 16 | 52.9% | 3 |
| Haywire Mite | Artifact Creature — Insect | 13 | 52.6% | 1 |
| Wylie Duke, Atiin Hero | Legendary Creature — Human Ranger | 7 | 51.5% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Wilt-Leaf Liege than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 1 | 6 | 83.8% | 70.3% | +13.5% |
| Overlord of the Balemurk | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 5 | 73.9% | 66.3% | +7.7% |
| Mockingbird | Creature — Bird Bard | 1 | 9 | 74.2% | 68.5% | +5.7% |
| Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 8 | 72.9% | 68.2% | +4.8% |
| Enduring Curiosity | Enchantment Creature — Cat Glimmer | 4 | 8 | 71.9% | 68.0% | +3.9% |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 2 | 15 | 71.6% | 68.5% | +3.1% |
| Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 14 | 73.4% | 70.4% | +3.0% |
| Spyglass Siren | Creature — Siren Pirate | 1 | 12 | 72.3% | 69.4% | +2.9% |
| Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 2 | 8 | 71.9% | 69.1% | +2.8% |
| Break the Spell | Instant | 1 | 6 | 69.2% | 66.6% | +2.6% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Control | 235 | 64.2% | 55.4% |
| Selesnya Cage | 119 | 47.6% | 46.0% |
| Esper Pixie | 76 | 4.9% | 65.5% |
| Mono White Tokens | 53 | 8.8% | 48.5% |
| Jeskai Convoke | 48 | 8.7% | 49.4% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.