Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 9-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12763156 |
| Golgari Midrange | slaxx | 5-0 | None |
| Unknown Archetype | alexanderrosdahl | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Golgari Midrange | xelz | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Domain Zur Overlords | squee_goblin_nabob | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , 4 Color Blink , 4 Color Legends , 4 Color Omniscience , 4 Color Repurposing , 5 Color Battles , 5 Color Legends , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Doubling
Meta Performance Analysis
Swamp ranks #340 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 54.3%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Swamp is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 29.43 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.0%. Swamp has a win rate of 67.9%, making it 1.6% worse than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cityscape Leveler | Artifact Creature — Construct | 5 | 80.0% | 4 |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 5 | 80.0% | 2 |
| Glass Casket | Artifact | 22 | 75.4% | 13 |
| Swiftfoot Boots | Artifact — Equipment | 5 | 72.2% | 2 |
| Lyra Dawnbringer | Legendary Creature — Angel | 14 | 71.4% | 10 |
| Riptide Gearhulk | Artifact Creature — Construct | 8 | 70.8% | 6 |
| Dewdrop Cure | Sorcery | 9 | 69.5% | 5 |
| Goldvein Hydra | Creature — Hydra | 5 | 69.3% | 2 |
| The Mightstone and Weakstone | Legendary Artifact — Powerstone | 9 | 67.1% | 6 |
| Sorcerous Spyglass | Artifact | 15 | 66.4% | 7 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Swamp than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leyline of the Void | Enchantment | 4 | 5 | 86.7% | 71.3% | +15.4% |
| Withering Torment | Instant | 3 | 7 | 85.0% | 74.4% | +10.6% |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 3 | 5 | 77.4% | 71.4% | +6.0% |
| Debris Beetle | Artifact — Vehicle | 4 | 6 | 75.0% | 69.1% | +5.9% |
| Scavenging Ooze | Creature — Ooze | 2 | 7 | 75.0% | 69.1% | +5.9% |
| Mazemind Tome | Artifact | 2 | 5 | 73.9% | 68.3% | +5.6% |
| Glissa Sunslayer | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Zombie Elf | 3 | 8 | 78.8% | 73.3% | +5.5% |
| Valgavoth's Faithful | Creature — Human Cleric | 1 | 5 | 78.8% | 73.3% | +5.5% |
| Lumbering Worldwagon | Artifact — Vehicle | 3 | 7 | 80.0% | 75.2% | +4.8% |
| Saiba Cryptomancer | Creature — Moonfolk Ninja | 2 | 18 | 76.7% | 72.3% | +4.4% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 2062 | 100.0% | 50.2% |
| Domain Zur Overlords | 1222 | 93.8% | 48.5% |
| Esper Pixie | 1160 | 75.0% | 54.5% |
| Golgari Midrange | 773 | 99.9% | 44.3% |
| Golgari Demons | 545 | 100.0% | 46.9% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.