Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Spellslingers | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Gruul Leyline | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Gruul Leyline | czechito | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Gruul Leyline | ocaroca | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | db_yungdingo | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Boros Auras , Boros Burn , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Leyline , Izzet Spellslingers , Mardu Prowess , Naya Aggro , Naya Auras , Rakdos Aggro
Meta Performance Analysis
Slickshot Show-Off ranks #126 out of approximately 409 cards in raw efficiency (top 31%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Red average: 66.2%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Slickshot Show-Off is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 26.74 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.5%. Slickshot Show-Off has a win rate of 79.9%, making it 7.2% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Third Path Iconoclast | Creature — Human Monk | 30 | 86.3% | 18 |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 16 | 85.8% | 9 |
| Slick Sequence | Instant | 24 | 85.3% | 15 |
| Hearth Elemental | Creature — Elemental // Sorcery — Adventure | 6 | 84.8% | 3 |
| Bounce Off | Instant | 25 | 80.2% | 15 |
| Ral, Crackling Wit | Legendary Planeswalker — Ral | 10 | 80.0% | 5 |
| Chandra, Spark Hunter | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 7 | 79.8% | 4 |
| Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 102 | 78.2% | 50 |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 95 | 76.8% | 43 |
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 113 | 75.2% | 54 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Slickshot Show-Off than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obliterating Bolt | Sorcery | 2 | 5 | 93.3% | 75.0% | +18.3% |
| Questing Druid | Creature — Human Druid // Instant — Adventure | 2 | 8 | 93.6% | 79.3% | +14.3% |
| Chandra, Spark Hunter | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 4 | 6 | 86.1% | 80.3% | +5.8% |
| Lightning Strike | Instant | 2 | 8 | 81.8% | 76.2% | +5.6% |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 11 | 82.5% | 77.3% | +5.2% |
| Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 4 | 58 | 82.8% | 77.9% | +5.0% |
| Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 4 | 53 | 82.1% | 77.2% | +4.9% |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 16 | 82.8% | 78.1% | +4.7% |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 32 | 84.0% | 79.7% | +4.2% |
| Burst Lightning | Instant | 1 | 92 | 82.2% | 78.2% | +4.0% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | 229 | 11.1% | 42.1% |
| Boros Burn | 172 | 44.0% | 40.1% |
| Gruul Leyline | 165 | 86.4% | 56.5% |
| Izzet Spellslingers | 126 | 98.4% | 72.8% |
| Red Deck Wins | 63 | 4.6% | 32.2% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.