Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Red Deck Wins | latorretta | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Gruul Aggro | maxmedeiros | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Red Deck Wins | latorretta | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Red Deck Wins | misstrigger | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Red Deck Wins | lee wilson | 5-0 | 2nd in Friday ReCQ - Standard 12:00 pm @ SCG CON Denver |
Boros Burn , Boros Forge , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Forge , Gruul Leyline , Izzet Aggro , Izzet Otters , Izzet Spellslingers , Jeskai Convoke , Naya Aggro
Shock ranks #11 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 3%).
Red average: 57.0%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Shock is an exceptional card that should be considered a format staple.
Recommended number of copies: 4
Performance Efficiency: 58.18 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 70.5%. Shock has a win rate of 80.0%, making it 13.5% better than other 1-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bushwhack | Sorcery | 5 | 76.7% | 2 |
Crystal Barricade | Artifact Creature — Wall | 5 | 68.0% | 2 |
Demonic Ruckus | Enchantment — Aura | 5 | 65.2% | 1 |
Soul-Guide Lantern | Artifact | 13 | 63.9% | 3 |
Scorching Dragonfire | Instant | 21 | 57.7% | 6 |
Fugitive Codebreaker | Creature — Goblin Rogue | 41 | 55.9% | 11 |
Stormchaser's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 6 | 55.2% | 2 |
Kellan, Planar Trailblazer | Legendary Creature — Human Faerie Scout | 23 | 50.4% | 4 |
Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 170 | 49.6% | 38 |
Pick Your Poison | Sorcery | 23 | 48.1% | 5 |
Cards that perform better with Shock than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 5 | 92.9% | 76.9% | +15.9% |
Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 4 | 10 | 80.0% | 75.6% | +4.4% |
Burst Lightning | Instant | 1 | 11 | 80.0% | 76.0% | +4.0% |
Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 7 | 78.6% | 75.0% | +3.6% |
Manifold Mouse | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 2 | 9 | 77.9% | 74.9% | +3.1% |
Torch the Tower | Instant | 1 | 8 | 78.8% | 75.9% | +3.0% |
Lightning Strike | Instant | 2 | 9 | 76.4% | 74.1% | +2.2% |
Screaming Nemesis | Creature — Spirit | 3 | 9 | 76.4% | 74.2% | +2.2% |
Lithomantic Barrage | Sorcery | 1 | 9 | 76.4% | 74.5% | +1.9% |
Heartfire Hero | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 1 | 9 | 76.4% | 74.9% | +1.5% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Gruul Aggro | 147 | 7.1% | 44.1% |
Red Deck Wins | 139 | 10.3% | 42.9% |
Boros Burn | 93 | 23.8% | 42.3% |
Unknown Archetype | 6 | 1.9% | 22.5% |
Rakdos Aggro | 6 | 10.3% | 5.6% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.