Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Dimir Bounce | lilianna1989 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Dimir Bounce | harlouuk | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Dimir Bounce | kingchainsaw | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Dimir Bounce | vcnet | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Dimir Bounce | toondoslav | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Saiba Cryptomancer ranks #145 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 36%).
Blue average: 71.3%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Saiba Cryptomancer is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 25.23 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.7%. Saiba Cryptomancer has a win rate of 78.0%, making it 5.8% better than other 2-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hopeless Nightmare | Enchantment | 28 | 81.5% | 15 |
Stormchaser's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 28 | 81.5% | 15 |
Grim Bauble | Artifact | 28 | 81.5% | 15 |
This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 28 | 81.5% | 15 |
Fear of Isolation | Enchantment Creature — Nightmare | 28 | 81.5% | 15 |
Get Out | Instant | 28 | 81.5% | 15 |
Thought-Stalker Warlock | Creature — Lizard Warlock | 14 | 78.7% | 6 |
Stab | Instant | 5 | 75.3% | 2 |
Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 23 | 72.7% | 11 |
Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 123 | 67.1% | 51 |
Cards that perform better with Saiba Cryptomancer than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 1 | 14 | 82.8% | 74.6% | +8.2% |
Kaito, Bane of Nightmares | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 4 | 17 | 78.0% | 73.2% | +4.8% |
Gix's Command | Sorcery | 5 | 17 | 78.0% | 73.5% | +4.4% |
Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 17 | 78.0% | 73.9% | +4.1% |
Nowhere to Run | Enchantment | 2 | 17 | 78.0% | 73.9% | +4.1% |
Fear of Isolation | Enchantment Creature — Nightmare | 2 | 17 | 78.0% | 73.9% | +4.0% |
Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 2 | 17 | 78.0% | 74.0% | +4.0% |
Hopeless Nightmare | Enchantment | 1 | 17 | 78.0% | 74.0% | +4.0% |
Grim Bauble | Artifact | 1 | 17 | 78.0% | 74.0% | +4.0% |
Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 3 | 17 | 78.0% | 74.1% | +3.9% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Dimir Midrange | 110 | 5.3% | 57.9% |
Dimir Bounce | 32 | 6.5% | 75.1% |
Mono Blue Tempo | 1 | 11.1% | 0.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.