Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|
5 Color Legends , Mardu Balloons , Unclassified , Unknown Archetype
Relic of Legends ranks #284 out of approximately 408 cards in raw efficiency (top 70%).
Colorless average: 63.2%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Relic of Legends is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 23.81 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.5%. Relic of Legends has a win rate of 71.4%, making it 2.8% worse than other 3-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nowhere to Run | Enchantment | 5 | 45.6% | 1 |
Jirina, Dauntless General | Legendary Creature — Human Soldier | 9 | 44.5% | 0 |
Ertai Resurrected | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Human Wizard | 18 | 43.2% | 1 |
Jodah, the Unifier | Legendary Creature — Human Wizard | 6 | 42.2% | 0 |
Duress | Sorcery | 9 | 41.5% | 0 |
Djeru and Hazoret | Legendary Creature — Human God | 6 | 41.3% | 0 |
Inti, Seneschal of the Sun | Legendary Creature — Human Knight | 21 | 40.3% | 1 |
Sigarda, Font of Blessings | Legendary Creature — Angel | 5 | 39.1% | 0 |
Rona, Herald of Invasion | Legendary Creature — Human Wizard // Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Wizard | 22 | 38.5% | 1 |
Honest Rutstein | Legendary Creature — Human Warlock | 21 | 38.4% | 1 |
Cards that perform better with Relic of Legends than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
5 Color Legends | 19 | 100.0% | 35.5% |
Unknown Archetype | 3 | 0.8% | 44.4% |
Mardu Balloons | 1 | 100.0% | 0.0% |
Unclassified | 1 | 0.5% | 71.4% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.