Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | solomonwolf | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Gruul Aggro | mogged | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Gruul Aggro | joaoclaudioms | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Rakdos Aggro | xenowan | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Gruul Aggro | mohammedbinsalman | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Boros Burn , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Cauldron , Gruul Counters , Gruul Delirium , Gruul Forge , Gruul Leyline , Gruul Surprise , Izzet Spellslingers
Meta Performance Analysis
Questing Druid ranks #133 out of approximately 409 cards in raw efficiency (top 33%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Green average: 65.7%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Questing Druid is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 29.50 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.5%. Questing Druid has a win rate of 78.7%, making it 5.5% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roxanne, Starfall Savant | Legendary Creature — Cat Druid | 6 | 92.9% | 5 |
| Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 7 | 84.3% | 4 |
| Surrak, Elusive Hunter | Legendary Creature — Human Warrior | 5 | 77.4% | 2 |
| Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 15 | 68.9% | 8 |
| Hearth Elemental | Creature — Elemental // Sorcery — Adventure | 6 | 68.6% | 2 |
| Invasion of Tarkir | Battle — Siege | 23 | 66.8% | 5 |
| Torch the Witness | Sorcery | 55 | 65.0% | 10 |
| Glissa Sunslayer | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Zombie Elf | 5 | 60.0% | 1 |
| Barbed Batterfist | Artifact — Equipment | 43 | 60.0% | 6 |
| Kellan, Planar Trailblazer | Legendary Creature — Human Faerie Scout | 28 | 57.1% | 5 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Questing Druid than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turn Inside Out | Instant | 1 | 7 | 100.0% | 77.5% | +22.5% |
| Callous Sell-Sword | Creature — Human Soldier // Sorcery — Adventure | 2 | 6 | 100.0% | 77.9% | +22.1% |
| Slickshot Show-Off | Creature — Bird Wizard | 2 | 8 | 93.6% | 79.3% | +14.3% |
| Monastery Swiftspear | Creature — Human Monk | 1 | 12 | 90.6% | 79.7% | +10.9% |
| Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 2 | 10 | 87.9% | 77.0% | +10.9% |
| Case of the Crimson Pulse | Enchantment — Case | 3 | 6 | 85.3% | 75.2% | +10.1% |
| Might of the Meek | Instant | 1 | 8 | 87.8% | 78.3% | +9.5% |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 23 | 84.5% | 79.1% | +5.4% |
| Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 4 | 12 | 79.8% | 76.6% | +3.2% |
| Pick Your Poison | Sorcery | 1 | 7 | 82.4% | 79.2% | +3.1% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | 1957 | 94.5% | 47.4% |
| Temur Otters | 258 | 76.8% | 42.8% |
| Gruul Leyline | 124 | 64.9% | 55.8% |
| Red Deck Wins | 88 | 6.4% | 38.6% |
| Gruul Delirium | 31 | 20.4% | 28.9% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.