Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | thetunnelingcat | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Dimir Midrange | itsjustsquid | 5-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | capitano_cl | 4-3 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | strongmind | 4-3 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | hamuda | 3-3 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Meta Performance Analysis
Qarsi Revenant ranks #303 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 75%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 73.4%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Qarsi Revenant is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 2.55 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.6%. Qarsi Revenant has a win rate of 61.1%, making it 16.9% worse than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duress | Sorcery | 5 | 64.3% | 1 |
| Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 5 | 63.5% | 1 |
| Cut Down | Instant | 5 | 57.1% | 1 |
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 5 | 57.1% | 1 |
| Go for the Throat | Instant | 5 | 57.1% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Qarsi Revenant than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scavenger Regent | Creature — Dragon | 4 | 6 | 69.0% | 64.5% | +4.6% |
| Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 5 | 69.2% | 65.3% | +4.0% |
| Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 6 | 68.6% | 66.1% | +2.6% |
| Deep-Cavern Bat | Creature — Bat | 2 | 5 | 65.6% | 64.3% | +1.3% |
| Enduring Curiosity | Enchantment Creature — Cat Glimmer | 4 | 5 | 65.6% | 65.2% | +0.5% |
| Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 6 | 65.6% | 65.5% | +0.2% |
| Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 2 | 5 | 65.6% | 65.5% | +0.1% |
| Spyglass Siren | Creature — Siren Pirate | 1 | 5 | 65.6% | 66.1% | -0.5% |
| Kaito, Bane of Nightmares | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 4 | 5 | 64.1% | 64.8% | -0.7% |
| Anoint with Affliction | Instant | 2 | 7 | 63.9% | 64.9% | -1.0% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 5 | 0.2% | 67.1% |
| Golgari Beanstalk | 2 | 6.7% | 12.5% |
| 1 | 1.7% | 0.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.