Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bant Toxic | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Golgari Reanimator | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Temur Otters | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Domain Zur Overlords | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Gruul Aggro | baku_91 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Bant Gearhulk , Bant Multiverse , Bant Toxic , Domain Control , Domain Overlords , Domain Ramp
Meta Performance Analysis
Pawpatch Formation ranks #179 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 44%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Green average: 67.1%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Pawpatch Formation is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 22.16 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.7%. Pawpatch Formation has a win rate of 74.8%, making it 1.5% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Archangel of Wrath | Creature — Angel | 9 | 75.5% | 5 |
| Invasion of Tarkir | Battle — Siege | 21 | 68.8% | 5 |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 15 | 67.6% | 6 |
| Not on My Watch | Instant | 6 | 65.1% | 3 |
| Aegis Turtle | Creature — Turtle | 22 | 63.2% | 5 |
| Sleight of Hand | Sorcery | 7 | 61.2% | 2 |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 22 | 60.3% | 9 |
| Herd Migration | Sorcery | 18 | 57.7% | 7 |
| Herbology Instructor | Creature — Treefolk Druid // Creature — Phyrexian Treefolk | 15 | 57.5% | 5 |
| Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 55 | 56.9% | 13 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Pawpatch Formation than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 8 | 86.7% | 75.1% | +11.6% |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 14 | 86.8% | 76.6% | +10.2% |
| Monastery Swiftspear | Creature — Human Monk | 1 | 5 | 82.4% | 77.2% | +5.2% |
| Atraxa, Grand Unifier | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Angel | 7 | 10 | 80.6% | 76.4% | +4.3% |
| Snakeskin Veil | Instant | 1 | 7 | 79.6% | 75.9% | +3.7% |
| Elesh Norn, Mother of Machines | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 5 | 9 | 76.0% | 72.4% | +3.6% |
| Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 4 | 10 | 76.6% | 73.3% | +3.3% |
| Nissa, Ascended Animist | Legendary Planeswalker — Nissa | 7 | 9 | 78.3% | 75.0% | +3.3% |
| Analyze the Pollen | Sorcery | 1 | 13 | 75.6% | 72.7% | +2.9% |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 21 | 77.1% | 74.5% | +2.6% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | 1873 | 90.8% | 48.0% |
| Domain Zur Overlords | 610 | 46.7% | 48.3% |
| Temur Otters | 329 | 97.9% | 43.8% |
| Simic Terror | 232 | 75.6% | 44.8% |
| Gruul Delirium | 131 | 86.2% | 40.2% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.