Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 | |
| platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 | |
| Gruul Dinosaurs | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Domain Zur Overlords | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Mono Green Ramp | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Doubling , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Reanimator , Abzan Superfriends , Bant Beanstalk , Bant Doubling , Bant Multiverse
Meta Performance Analysis
Overlord of the Hauntwoods ranks #357 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 88%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Green average: 67.1%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Overlord of the Hauntwoods is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 7.71 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 5 mana, the average win rate in the format is 71.8%. Overlord of the Hauntwoods has a win rate of 74.1%, making it 3.2% better than other 5-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locust Spray | Instant | 5 | 91.4% | 4 |
| Lyra Dawnbringer | Legendary Creature — Angel | 15 | 85.6% | 12 |
| Glass Casket | Artifact | 20 | 76.7% | 12 |
| Riptide Gearhulk | Artifact Creature — Construct | 8 | 70.8% | 6 |
| Boon-Bringer Valkyrie | Creature — Angel Warrior | 24 | 69.9% | 14 |
| Shoot the Sheriff | Instant | 9 | 69.0% | 5 |
| Regal Caracal | Creature — Cat | 5 | 68.6% | 3 |
| Chrome Host Seedshark | Creature — Phyrexian Shark | 27 | 68.2% | 11 |
| Ugin, Eye of the Storms | Legendary Planeswalker — Ugin | 6 | 63.6% | 2 |
| Lukka, Bound to Ruin | Legendary Planeswalker — Lukka | 6 | 62.1% | 2 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Overlord of the Hauntwoods than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tranquil Frillback | Creature — Dinosaur | 3 | 7 | 87.0% | 70.8% | +16.1% |
| Llanowar Elves | Creature — Elf Druid | 1 | 8 | 81.2% | 74.5% | +6.8% |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 6 | 79.3% | 74.8% | +4.6% |
| Nissa, Ascended Animist | Legendary Planeswalker — Nissa | 7 | 29 | 77.0% | 74.6% | +2.4% |
| Deadly Cover-Up | Sorcery | 5 | 7 | 80.0% | 77.7% | +2.3% |
| Tear Asunder | Instant | 2 | 30 | 75.4% | 73.7% | +1.6% |
| Ugin, Eye of the Storms | Legendary Planeswalker — Ugin | 7 | 6 | 77.4% | 76.1% | +1.3% |
| Sunfall | Sorcery | 5 | 28 | 75.8% | 75.0% | +0.8% |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 37 | 72.6% | 72.2% | +0.3% |
| Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 3 | 27 | 74.0% | 73.7% | +0.3% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Zur Overlords | 1306 | 100.0% | 48.6% |
| Selesnya Beanstalk | 65 | 100.0% | 44.0% |
| Golgari Midrange | 61 | 7.8% | 33.1% |
| Domain Overlords | 33 | 100.0% | 44.8% |
| Golgari Beanstalk | 29 | 96.7% | 38.5% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.