Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | ander_lizarrakoa | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Gruul Aggro | pcpalhares | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Gruul Aggro | shinubi | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Red Deck Wins | numberonenoob | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Gruul Aggro | ander_lizarrakoa | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Boros Auras , Boros Burn , Boros Convoke , Boros Discover , Boros Forge , Boros Mice , Boros Monument , Goblins , Gruul Aggro
Meta Performance Analysis
Obliterating Bolt ranks #218 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 54%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Red average: 67.0%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Obliterating Bolt is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 19.04 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.7%. Obliterating Bolt has a win rate of 67.0%, making it 9.1% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surrak, Elusive Hunter | Legendary Creature — Human Warrior | 5 | 77.4% | 2 |
| Cenote Scout | Creature — Merfolk Scout | 11 | 65.2% | 5 |
| Wrenn's Resolve | Sorcery | 13 | 62.0% | 1 |
| Rubblebelt Maverick | Creature — Human Detective | 5 | 56.9% | 1 |
| Torch the Witness | Sorcery | 19 | 56.6% | 1 |
| Barbed Batterfist | Artifact — Equipment | 19 | 54.2% | 1 |
| Llanowar Elves | Creature — Elf Druid | 21 | 52.9% | 5 |
| Lightning Strike | Instant | 58 | 51.7% | 11 |
| Kellan, Planar Trailblazer | Legendary Creature — Human Faerie Scout | 7 | 51.4% | 0 |
| Thrun, Breaker of Silence | Legendary Creature — Troll Shaman | 8 | 50.7% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Obliterating Bolt than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 5 | 90.0% | 69.3% | +20.7% |
| Stormchaser's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 1 | 5 | 90.0% | 70.6% | +19.4% |
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 1 | 5 | 90.0% | 71.6% | +18.4% |
| Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 2 | 5 | 88.9% | 71.9% | +17.0% |
| Opt | Instant | 1 | 5 | 90.0% | 73.5% | +16.5% |
| Sleight of Hand | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 90.0% | 74.1% | +15.9% |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 6 | 80.0% | 71.2% | +8.8% |
| Monastery Swiftspear | Creature — Human Monk | 1 | 11 | 81.8% | 73.2% | +8.6% |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 33 | 75.3% | 72.6% | +2.6% |
| Sentinel of the Nameless City | Creature — Merfolk Warrior Scout | 3 | 12 | 71.8% | 69.3% | +2.5% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | 1429 | 69.2% | 47.1% |
| Red Deck Wins | 367 | 26.9% | 47.6% |
| Gruul Delirium | 130 | 85.5% | 40.6% |
| Boros Burn | 49 | 12.5% | 55.8% |
| Izzet Spellslingers | 17 | 15.2% | 55.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.