Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Artifacts | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Dimir Control | crystalpalacefc | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Unknown Archetype | gigachadsigmamale | 6-2 | None |
| Unknown Archetype | kinghairy | 4-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Omniscience , Abzan Beanstalk , Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Control , Bant Beanstalk , Bant Control , Boros Tokens Control , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons
Meta Performance Analysis
Mazemind Tome ranks #160 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 39%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 65.4%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Mazemind Tome is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 17.46 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.7%. Mazemind Tome has a win rate of 78.6%, making it 6.6% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 11 | 74.3% | 5 |
| Phyrexian Arena | Enchantment | 5 | 74.3% | 3 |
| The Eternal Wanderer | Legendary Planeswalker | 5 | 72.0% | 3 |
| Urza's Sylex | Legendary Artifact | 10 | 71.1% | 2 |
| Lightning Helix | Instant | 7 | 64.7% | 3 |
| Parting Gust | Instant | 11 | 60.1% | 1 |
| Oildeep Gearhulk | Artifact Creature — Construct | 38 | 59.1% | 9 |
| Ancient Vendetta | Sorcery | 12 | 58.5% | 1 |
| Phyrexian Obliterator | Creature — Phyrexian Horror | 30 | 57.7% | 8 |
| Binding Negotiation | Sorcery | 6 | 57.7% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Mazemind Tome than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three Steps Ahead | Instant | 1 | 6 | 82.1% | 78.1% | +4.0% |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 7 | 78.0% | 77.0% | +1.1% |
| Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 7 | 75.0% | 74.9% | +0.1% |
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 6 | 74.3% | 76.9% | -2.7% |
| Split Up | Sorcery | 3 | 5 | 75.0% | 77.9% | -2.9% |
| Ride's End | Instant | 5 | 5 | 71.0% | 75.9% | -4.9% |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 4 | 5 | 71.0% | 76.3% | -5.4% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Control | 49 | 67.1% | 57.5% |
| Dimir Midrange | 27 | 1.3% | 64.0% |
| Unknown Archetype | 22 | 7.0% | 42.9% |
| Azorius Control | 19 | 5.1% | 42.2% |
| Orzhov Control | 19 | 86.4% | 37.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.