Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Orzhov Pixie | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Orzhov Midrange | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Esper Pixie | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Esper Pixie | bante | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Legends , 5 Color Legends , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Pixie , Azorius Aggro , Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Auras , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Control
Meta Performance Analysis
Loran of the Third Path ranks #289 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 71%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 74.9%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Loran of the Third Path is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 10.60 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.6%. Loran of the Third Path has a win rate of 68.4%, making it 7.1% worse than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 6 | 66.1% | 1 |
| Elesh Norn, Mother of Machines | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 8 | 60.0% | 3 |
| The End | Instant | 5 | 60.0% | 3 |
| Bandit's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 6 | 59.9% | 1 |
| Boon-Bringer Valkyrie | Creature — Angel Warrior | 11 | 58.5% | 3 |
| Tinybones, the Pickpocket | Legendary Creature — Skeleton Rogue | 23 | 57.2% | 6 |
| Bounce Off | Instant | 7 | 56.0% | 3 |
| Fortune, Loyal Steed | Legendary Creature — Beast Mount | 5 | 55.4% | 2 |
| Novice Inspector | Creature — Human Detective | 5 | 55.0% | 1 |
| Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 7 | 53.1% | 4 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Loran of the Third Path than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 3 | 8 | 83.6% | 73.3% | +10.3% |
| Three Steps Ahead | Instant | 1 | 5 | 81.8% | 73.0% | +8.8% |
| Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 3 | 9 | 75.5% | 69.3% | +6.2% |
| Break the Spell | Instant | 1 | 9 | 75.6% | 70.7% | +4.8% |
| Tinybones Joins Up | Legendary Enchantment | 1 | 6 | 77.5% | 73.0% | +4.5% |
| Entity Tracker | Creature — Human Scout | 3 | 17 | 73.3% | 69.9% | +3.5% |
| Defiled Crypt/Cadaver Lab | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 5 | 24 | 71.5% | 68.7% | +2.8% |
| Spiteful Hexmage | Creature — Human Warlock | 1 | 24 | 72.2% | 69.6% | +2.6% |
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 9 | 74.4% | 71.8% | +2.6% |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 8 | 74.4% | 72.6% | +1.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 544 | 35.0% | 51.9% |
| Azorius Flash | 101 | 44.9% | 53.4% |
| Azorius Glyph | 71 | 61.7% | 62.6% |
| Orzhov Pixie | 61 | 89.7% | 49.4% |
| Mono White Tokens | 61 | 10.1% | 34.9% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.