Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Jeskai Oculus | bernardocssa | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Jeskai Oculus | gobern | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Jeskai Oculus | vitto. | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Jeskai Oculus | darth_vaner | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053 |
Jeskai Oculus | phoenix_flame | 7-2 | None |
Azorius Omniscience , Dimir Flash , Dimir Midrange , Izzet Otters , Izzet Ral , Jeskai Oculus , Mono Blue Reenact , Sultai Cauldron , Temur Otters , Unclassified
Kitsa, Otterball Elite ranks #152 out of approximately 409 cards in raw efficiency (top 37%).
Blue average: 71.5%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Kitsa, Otterball Elite is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 23.98 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.5%. Kitsa, Otterball Elite has a win rate of 75.4%, making it 1.1% better than other 2-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scorching Dragonfire | Instant | 7 | 86.4% | 5 |
Ill-Timed Explosion | Sorcery | 8 | 71.0% | 5 |
Winternight Stories | Sorcery | 10 | 70.5% | 4 |
Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 10 | 70.5% | 4 |
Glacial Dragonhunt | Sorcery | 10 | 70.5% | 4 |
Up the Beanstalk | Enchantment | 12 | 67.5% | 5 |
Marauding Mako | Creature — Shark Pirate | 15 | 64.9% | 5 |
Loran of the Third Path | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 10 | 63.9% | 5 |
Analyze the Pollen | Sorcery | 15 | 57.0% | 5 |
Monument to Endurance | Artifact | 5 | 56.4% | 2 |
Cards that perform better with Kitsa, Otterball Elite than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spell Pierce | Instant | 1 | 10 | 78.9% | 76.4% | +2.5% |
Negate | Instant | 2 | 9 | 78.0% | 75.5% | +2.5% |
Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 9 | 78.0% | 76.5% | +1.4% |
Destroy Evil | Instant | 2 | 10 | 75.8% | 74.8% | +1.0% |
Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 9 | 78.0% | 77.5% | +0.5% |
Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 3 | 10 | 75.8% | 75.6% | +0.1% |
Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 11 | 75.4% | 75.3% | +0.0% |
Chandra, Spark Hunter | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 4 | 9 | 78.0% | 78.0% | -0.0% |
Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 10 | 75.8% | 75.9% | -0.1% |
Torch the Tower | Instant | 1 | 11 | 75.4% | 75.8% | -0.5% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Azorius Omniscience | 47 | 13.7% | 53.1% |
Jeskai Oculus | 32 | 11.6% | 48.2% |
Temur Otters | 15 | 4.5% | 54.7% |
Dimir Midrange | 3 | 0.1% | 44.9% |
Unknown Archetype | 3 | 1.0% | 8.3% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.