Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Spellslingers | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | pizzangry | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | nilsfit | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Jeskai Oculus | jacro | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | hyper | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Omniscience , Azorius Aggro , Azorius Auras , Azorius Control , Azorius Flash , Azorius Omniscience , Azorius Soldiers , Azorius Synthesizer , Azorius Tempo
Meta Performance Analysis
Into the Flood Maw ranks #32 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 8%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 71.3%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Into the Flood Maw is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.
Recommended number of copies: 4
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 57.68 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.2%. Into the Flood Maw has a win rate of 79.6%, making it 7.3% better than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 7 | 86.5% | 4 |
| Dive Down | Instant | 7 | 84.5% | 4 |
| Monastery Swiftspear | Creature — Human Monk | 36 | 82.4% | 20 |
| Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 31 | 81.7% | 16 |
| Wrenn's Resolve | Sorcery | 6 | 81.1% | 3 |
| Shrouded Shepherd | Creature — Spirit Warrior // Sorcery — Adventure | 8 | 80.4% | 5 |
| Winternight Stories | Sorcery | 7 | 79.9% | 3 |
| Slickshot Show-Off | Creature — Bird Wizard | 36 | 79.7% | 19 |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 37 | 79.5% | 19 |
| Monstrous Rage | Instant | 37 | 79.5% | 19 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Into the Flood Maw than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 4 | 26 | 85.1% | 75.7% | +9.4% |
| This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 9 | 82.4% | 75.6% | +6.7% |
| Screaming Nemesis | Creature — Spirit | 3 | 13 | 81.7% | 74.9% | +6.7% |
| Urabrask's Forge | Artifact | 3 | 6 | 87.5% | 81.1% | +6.4% |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 13 | 84.5% | 78.2% | +6.3% |
| Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 5 | 84.6% | 78.4% | +6.2% |
| Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 4 | 35 | 82.7% | 76.9% | +5.9% |
| Slick Sequence | Instant | 2 | 8 | 83.3% | 77.7% | +5.7% |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 49 | 83.0% | 77.5% | +5.5% |
| Boltwave | Sorcery | 1 | 10 | 87.8% | 82.7% | +5.1% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Tempo | 153 | 38.4% | 30.1% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 135 | 50.0% | 45.9% |
| Simic Terror | 92 | 30.0% | 41.9% |
| Temur Otters | 80 | 23.8% | 42.7% |
| Izzet Spellslingers | 71 | 63.4% | 73.6% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.