Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Bounce | ingos | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Esper Pixie | ouranos139 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Unknown Archetype | don_goto1990 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Dimir Bounce | oscar_franco | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Esper Pixie | skeptic2304 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Legends , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Faeries , Dimir Flash , Dimir Midrange
Meta Performance Analysis
Dreams of Steel and Oil ranks #71 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 17%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 73.4%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Dreams of Steel and Oil is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 37.93 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.2%. Dreams of Steel and Oil has a win rate of 71.1%, making it 4.1% worse than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witch's Vanity | Enchantment — Saga | 8 | 74.2% | 2 |
| Get Out | Instant | 9 | 71.1% | 3 |
| Entity Tracker | Creature — Human Scout | 8 | 69.6% | 5 |
| Jace, the Perfected Mind | Legendary Planeswalker — Jace | 5 | 68.1% | 0 |
| No More Lies | Instant | 11 | 66.2% | 2 |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 7 | 65.0% | 3 |
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 17 | 62.7% | 7 |
| Loran of the Third Path | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 17 | 61.8% | 3 |
| Break the Spell | Instant | 10 | 61.3% | 3 |
| Breach the Multiverse | Sorcery | 6 | 61.1% | 3 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Dreams of Steel and Oil than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saiba Cryptomancer | Creature — Moonfolk Ninja | 2 | 14 | 82.8% | 74.6% | +8.2% |
| The End | Instant | 4 | 5 | 81.6% | 73.9% | +7.7% |
| Get Out | Instant | 2 | 20 | 78.8% | 72.5% | +6.3% |
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 28 | 78.7% | 73.2% | +5.5% |
| Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 2 | 31 | 75.4% | 70.5% | +4.9% |
| Defiled Crypt/Cadaver Lab | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 5 | 29 | 73.6% | 70.1% | +3.6% |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 6 | 77.5% | 74.0% | +3.5% |
| Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 5 | 77.3% | 74.1% | +3.1% |
| Spyglass Siren | Creature — Siren Pirate | 1 | 31 | 74.2% | 71.2% | +3.1% |
| Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 38 | 73.9% | 71.1% | +2.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 373 | 24.0% | 55.7% |
| Dimir Midrange | 117 | 5.7% | 43.4% |
| Golgari Demons | 113 | 20.7% | 43.9% |
| Golgari Midrange | 82 | 10.6% | 35.4% |
| Dimir Bounce | 57 | 11.6% | 63.5% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.