Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Zur Overlords | genyao | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Domain Zur Overlords | missflood | 5-2 | None |
| Domain Zur Overlords | alemilan19 | 4-2 | None |
| Domain Zur Overlords | mogged | 4-2 | None |
| Domain Zur Overlords | ashe_oathkeeper | 4-3 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
5 Color Caves , Bant Beanstalk , Bant Control , Bant Synthesizer , Domain Ramp , Domain Zur Overlords , Golgari Midrange , Mono White Tokens , Selesnya Beanstalk
Meta Performance Analysis
Doppelgang ranks #209 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 51%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Multi average: 67.0%
Performance compared to other Multi cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Doppelgang is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 11.11 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.7%. Doppelgang has a win rate of 66.7%, making it 9.5% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aftermath Analyst | Creature — Elf Detective | 5 | 55.4% | 0 |
| Virtue of Strength | Enchantment // Sorcery — Adventure | 5 | 55.4% | 0 |
| Nissa, Resurgent Animist | Legendary Creature — Elf Scout | 5 | 55.4% | 0 |
| Lumra, Bellow of the Woods | Legendary Creature — Elemental Bear | 5 | 55.4% | 0 |
| Inspiration from Beyond | Sorcery | 5 | 55.4% | 0 |
| Fires of Victory | Instant | 5 | 55.4% | 0 |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 5 | 53.7% | 1 |
| Split Up | Sorcery | 7 | 52.7% | 1 |
| Analyze the Pollen | Sorcery | 6 | 49.8% | 1 |
| Bonny Pall, Clearcutter | Legendary Creature — Giant Scout | 7 | 49.1% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Doppelgang than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 7 | 81.8% | 71.0% | +10.8% |
| Elspeth's Smite | Instant | 1 | 5 | 71.4% | 69.2% | +2.2% |
| Nissa, Ascended Animist | Legendary Planeswalker — Nissa | 7 | 5 | 72.2% | 70.9% | +1.3% |
| Overlord of the Mistmoors | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 7 | 5 | 66.7% | 68.0% | -1.4% |
| Zur, Eternal Schemer | Legendary Creature — Human Wizard | 3 | 5 | 66.7% | 68.3% | -1.7% |
| Leyline Binding | Enchantment | 6 | 5 | 66.7% | 69.4% | -2.7% |
| Overlord of the Hauntwoods | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 5 | 66.7% | 70.4% | -3.7% |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 7 | 66.7% | 70.5% | -3.8% |
| Up the Beanstalk | Enchantment | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 70.6% | -3.9% |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 4 | 5 | 64.5% | 70.4% | -5.9% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Zur Overlords | 598 | 45.8% | 52.2% |
| Unknown Archetype | 10 | 3.2% | 18.6% |
| Temur Analyst | 5 | 100.0% | 55.2% |
| 2 | 3.4% | 0.0% | |
| Temur Beanstalk | 2 | 50.0% | 33.3% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.