Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Aggro | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Selesnya Cage | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Red Deck Wins | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Mono White Tokens | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Jeskai Oculus | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , Abzan Beanstalk , Azorius Affinity , Azorius Aggro , Azorius Angels , Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Auras , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Control
Meta Performance Analysis
Destroy Evil ranks #180 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 44%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 74.9%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Destroy Evil is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 22.58 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.7%. Destroy Evil has a win rate of 73.3%, making it 0.6% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 11 | 76.3% | 7 |
| Unidentified Hovership | Artifact — Vehicle | 6 | 76.2% | 4 |
| Thundertrap Trainer | Creature — Otter Wizard | 7 | 74.9% | 3 |
| Bottomless Pool/Locker Room | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 27 | 74.8% | 11 |
| Novice Inspector | Creature — Human Detective | 11 | 73.0% | 6 |
| Raise the Past | Sorcery | 9 | 73.0% | 6 |
| Regal Bunnicorn | Creature — Rabbit Unicorn | 10 | 72.9% | 6 |
| Warden of the Inner Sky | Creature — Human Soldier | 10 | 72.9% | 6 |
| Mockingbird | Creature — Bird Bard | 51 | 68.8% | 21 |
| Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 49 | 64.8% | 13 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Destroy Evil than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 4 | 6 | 87.0% | 73.7% | +13.2% |
| Shardmage's Rescue | Enchantment — Aura | 1 | 6 | 88.9% | 75.9% | +13.0% |
| Manifold Mouse | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 2 | 7 | 81.4% | 72.3% | +9.1% |
| Heartfire Hero | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 1 | 7 | 81.4% | 72.4% | +9.0% |
| Emberheart Challenger | Creature — Mouse Warrior | 2 | 7 | 81.4% | 72.4% | +9.0% |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 3 | 23 | 84.0% | 75.2% | +8.8% |
| Brightglass Gearhulk | Artifact Creature — Construct | 4 | 5 | 84.2% | 76.2% | +8.0% |
| Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 2 | 11 | 79.5% | 71.6% | +7.8% |
| Spyglass Siren | Creature — Siren Pirate | 1 | 29 | 80.0% | 72.2% | +7.8% |
| Enduring Curiosity | Enchantment Creature — Cat Glimmer | 4 | 10 | 77.9% | 71.2% | +6.7% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 1409 | 90.5% | 54.4% |
| Jeskai Convoke | 500 | 89.9% | 49.2% |
| Boros Burn | 277 | 70.8% | 53.9% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 233 | 86.3% | 50.8% |
| Red Deck Wins | 202 | 14.8% | 51.5% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.