Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 | |
| Orzhov Midrange | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Mono Green Ramp | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Mardu Siegebreaker | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Selesnya Cage | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Doubling , Azorius Aggro , Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Auras , Azorius Control , Azorius Omniscience , Azorius Soldiers , Azorius Synthesizer
Meta Performance Analysis
Demolition Field ranks #410 out of approximately 409 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 65.1%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Demolition Field is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 36.28 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.9%. Demolition Field has a win rate of 73.9%, making it 0.0% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locust Spray | Instant | 5 | 91.4% | 4 |
| Essence Scatter | Instant | 11 | 84.8% | 5 |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 7 | 81.6% | 3 |
| Etali, Primal Conqueror | Legendary Creature — Elder Dinosaur // Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Elder Dinosaur | 9 | 74.6% | 4 |
| Skrelv's Hive | Enchantment | 6 | 65.3% | 2 |
| Chandra, Spark Hunter | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 10 | 64.3% | 3 |
| Karn, Living Legacy | Legendary Planeswalker — Karn | 12 | 62.6% | 2 |
| Elspeth, Storm Slayer | Legendary Planeswalker — Elspeth | 16 | 62.2% | 3 |
| Fear of Missing Out | Enchantment Creature — Nightmare | 10 | 62.1% | 3 |
| Minor Misstep | Instant | 6 | 61.4% | 2 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Demolition Field than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exorcise | Sorcery | 2 | 5 | 94.4% | 78.5% | +15.9% |
| Brotherhood's End | Sorcery | 3 | 7 | 79.1% | 73.5% | +5.5% |
| Overlord of the Balemurk | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 7 | 79.1% | 74.0% | +5.0% |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 3 | 7 | 79.1% | 74.9% | +4.2% |
| Torch the Tower | Instant | 1 | 7 | 79.1% | 75.1% | +4.0% |
| Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 3 | 9 | 76.6% | 72.9% | +3.7% |
| Atraxa, Grand Unifier | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Angel | 7 | 7 | 79.1% | 75.6% | +3.5% |
| Zombify | Sorcery | 4 | 8 | 81.6% | 78.5% | +3.1% |
| Fear of Missing Out | Enchantment Creature — Nightmare | 2 | 7 | 79.1% | 76.1% | +3.0% |
| Etali, Primal Conqueror | Legendary Creature — Elder Dinosaur // Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Elder Dinosaur | 7 | 8 | 81.6% | 79.1% | +2.5% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Control | 364 | 96.8% | 51.8% |
| Mono White Tokens | 362 | 59.5% | 42.3% |
| Golgari Midrange | 100 | 12.8% | 39.3% |
| Unknown Archetype | 52 | 16.6% | 29.1% |
| Golgari Demons | 47 | 8.6% | 33.4% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.