Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mardu Siegebreaker | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Rakdos Lizards | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Goblins | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 | |
| platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , 4 Color Legends , 5 Color Legends , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Azorius Angels , Azorius Auras , Azorius Omniscience , Azorius Soldiers
Meta Performance Analysis
Cavern of Souls ranks #410 out of approximately 409 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 65.1%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Cavern of Souls is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 41.32 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.9%. Cavern of Souls has a win rate of 78.7%, making it 6.5% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clifftop Lookout | Creature — Frog Scout | 6 | 77.8% | 4 |
| Glass Casket | Artifact | 20 | 76.7% | 12 |
| Chrome Host Seedshark | Creature — Phyrexian Shark | 44 | 66.8% | 17 |
| Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 5 | 64.3% | 2 |
| Seized from Slumber | Instant | 110 | 62.7% | 48 |
| Painter's Studio/Defaced Gallery | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 12 | 62.2% | 3 |
| Cosmic Rebirth | Instant | 5 | 61.3% | 1 |
| Getaway Glamer | Instant | 5 | 60.3% | 2 |
| Boon-Bringer Valkyrie | Creature — Angel Warrior | 20 | 60.1% | 9 |
| Quick Study | Instant | 22 | 59.8% | 6 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Cavern of Souls than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 10 | 86.8% | 77.0% | +9.8% |
| Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 6 | 7 | 86.1% | 78.4% | +7.7% |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 14 | 84.8% | 77.6% | +7.3% |
| Oracle of Tragedy | Creature — Human Wizard | 2 | 7 | 82.5% | 75.7% | +6.8% |
| Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 3 | 22 | 82.2% | 75.9% | +6.3% |
| Riptide Gearhulk | Artifact Creature — Construct | 5 | 9 | 80.0% | 74.9% | +5.1% |
| Invasion of Arcavios | Battle — Siege // Enchantment | 5 | 10 | 82.4% | 77.6% | +4.7% |
| Tear Asunder | Instant | 2 | 10 | 81.1% | 76.5% | +4.6% |
| Grand Abolisher | Creature — Human Cleric | 2 | 9 | 80.0% | 75.6% | +4.4% |
| Fallaji Archaeologist | Creature — Human Scout | 2 | 9 | 80.0% | 76.0% | +4.0% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Zur Overlords | 1093 | 83.5% | 47.9% |
| Azorius Omniscience | 86 | 25.0% | 50.9% |
| Dimir Demons | 45 | 44.1% | 46.7% |
| Unknown Archetype | 36 | 11.5% | 27.5% |
| Domain Overlords | 33 | 100.0% | 44.8% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.