Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|
Gruul Beanstalk , Gruul Surprise , Jund Surprise , Rakdos Reanimator , Temur Beanstalk , Unknown Archetype
Calamity, Galloping Inferno ranks #409 out of approximately 408 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Red average: 62.1%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Calamity, Galloping Inferno is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: N/A (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 10 | 47.1% | 2 |
Urabrask's Forge | Artifact | 6 | 46.8% | 1 |
Archdruid's Charm | Instant | 6 | 44.4% | 1 |
Sentinel of the Nameless City | Creature — Merfolk Warrior Scout | 9 | 44.1% | 1 |
Scavenging Ooze | Creature — Ooze | 6 | 41.7% | 1 |
Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 13 | 41.5% | 2 |
Glimpse the Core | Sorcery | 12 | 41.4% | 2 |
Llanowar Elves | Creature — Elf Druid | 26 | 40.2% | 4 |
Lithomantic Barrage | Sorcery | 11 | 39.8% | 2 |
Outcaster Trailblazer | Creature — Human Druid | 13 | 38.3% | 2 |
Cards that perform better with Calamity, Galloping Inferno than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Gruul Surprise | 22 | 84.6% | 38.1% |
Unknown Archetype | 4 | 1.1% | 16.7% |
Jund Surprise | 3 | 50.0% | 8.3% |
Temur Beanstalk | 2 | 50.0% | 64.3% |
Gruul Beanstalk | 1 | 20.0% | 40.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.