Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selesnya Cage | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Bant Toxic | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Selesnya Gearhulk | kram1138 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Selesnya Beanstalk | mj_23 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Domain Zur Overlords | hkanfer | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Abzan Roots , Bant Auras , Bant Beanstalk , Bant Gearhulk , Bant Multiverse
Meta Performance Analysis
Brushland ranks #407 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 65.4%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Brushland is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 48.78 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.2%. Brushland has a win rate of 75.4%, making it 3.0% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chrome Host Seedshark | Creature — Phyrexian Shark | 7 | 95.2% | 6 |
| Lyra Dawnbringer | Legendary Creature — Angel | 13 | 84.6% | 11 |
| Glass Casket | Artifact | 18 | 83.7% | 12 |
| Outrageous Robbery | Instant | 33 | 77.4% | 15 |
| Break the Spell | Instant | 6 | 73.8% | 2 |
| Overlord of the Floodpits | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 65 | 71.2% | 40 |
| Teething Wurmlet | Creature — Wurm | 21 | 69.6% | 10 |
| Tolsimir, Midnight's Light | Legendary Creature — Elf Scout | 11 | 69.4% | 4 |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 13 | 69.0% | 6 |
| Pest Control | Sorcery | 39 | 68.5% | 23 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Brushland than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elspeth's Smite | Instant | 1 | 5 | 88.9% | 73.6% | +15.3% |
| Overlord of the Mistmoors | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 7 | 9 | 82.9% | 72.4% | +10.5% |
| Elspeth, Storm Slayer | Legendary Planeswalker — Elspeth | 5 | 5 | 81.2% | 71.6% | +9.7% |
| Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 4 | 7 | 80.8% | 72.8% | +8.0% |
| Get Lost | Instant | 2 | 7 | 82.4% | 75.1% | +7.2% |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 7 | 79.3% | 74.8% | +4.5% |
| Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 6 | 78.9% | 76.3% | +2.7% |
| Llanowar Elves | Creature — Elf Druid | 1 | 10 | 77.5% | 75.1% | +2.4% |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 4 | 6 | 76.9% | 74.7% | +2.2% |
| Brightglass Gearhulk | Artifact Creature — Construct | 4 | 6 | 79.2% | 77.3% | +1.9% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selesnya Cage | 251 | 99.6% | 48.9% |
| Domain Zur Overlords | 140 | 10.7% | 58.3% |
| Selesnya Beanstalk | 59 | 90.8% | 43.3% |
| Selesnya Artifacts | 21 | 100.0% | 69.6% |
| Domain Overlords | 20 | 60.6% | 49.3% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.