Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boros Equipments | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Boros Burn | koscheii | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Esper Pixie | stormguyisme | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Esper Pixie | raizeer | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Esper Pixie | padreterno | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Tempo , Boros Burn , Boros Convoke , Boros Equipments , Domain Zur Overlords , Esper Pixie , Jeskai Convoke , Jeskai Monument , Jeskai Oculus
Meta Performance Analysis
Break the Spell ranks #84 out of approximately 412 cards in raw efficiency (top 20%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 72.9%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Break the Spell is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 2
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 26.57 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.0%. Break the Spell has a win rate of 69.1%, making it 5.4% worse than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Break the Spell than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 3 | 8 | 80.0% | 70.3% | +9.7% |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 2 | 10 | 76.0% | 69.5% | +6.5% |
| Loran of the Third Path | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 3 | 10 | 72.5% | 68.1% | +4.4% |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 11 | 71.9% | 69.3% | +2.6% |
| Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 4 | 5 | 69.7% | 69.3% | +0.4% |
| Momentum Breaker | Enchantment | 2 | 19 | 68.6% | 68.5% | +0.1% |
| Destroy Evil | Instant | 2 | 23 | 70.1% | 70.5% | -0.4% |
| Spiteful Hexmage | Creature — Human Warlock | 1 | 7 | 69.0% | 69.7% | -0.6% |
| Nurturing Pixie | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 1 | 21 | 67.2% | 68.1% | -0.9% |
| Nowhere to Run | Enchantment | 2 | 21 | 67.2% | 69.0% | -1.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 246 | 15.9% | 55.2% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 21 | 8.0% | 45.2% |
| Boros Burn | 15 | 3.8% | 73.7% |
| Azorius Tempo | 12 | 3.0% | 38.0% |
| Unknown Archetype | 3 | 1.0% | 0.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.