Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mono Black Demons | brunoprince | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Dimir Control | qqqwwweee | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Dimir Midrange | gtx120 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Dimir Control | crystalpalacefc | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Dimir Midrange | thetunnelingcat | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , 5 Color Legends , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Roots , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Faeries
Meta Performance Analysis
Blot Out ranks #214 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 63%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 60.1%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Blot Out is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 14.31 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.2%. Blot Out has a win rate of 71.6%, making it 3.5% better than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Royal Treatment | Instant | 6 | 83.3% | 3 |
| Riverchurn Monument | Artifact | 5 | 68.4% | 1 |
| Tithing Blade | Artifact // Artifact | 7 | 68.3% | 1 |
| Chrome Host Seedshark | Creature — Phyrexian Shark | 6 | 66.6% | 1 |
| Breach the Multiverse | Sorcery | 5 | 66.2% | 2 |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 30 | 64.8% | 8 |
| Phyrexian Obliterator | Creature — Phyrexian Horror | 26 | 64.6% | 7 |
| Change the Equation | Instant | 21 | 63.5% | 6 |
| Archfiend of the Dross | Creature — Phyrexian Demon | 27 | 62.2% | 8 |
| Doomsday Excruciator | Creature — Demon | 31 | 59.8% | 7 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Blot Out than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 79.2% | 70.3% | +8.9% |
| Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 3 | 12 | 77.8% | 70.3% | +7.4% |
| Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 16 | 77.0% | 70.0% | +7.0% |
| Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 20 | 75.2% | 70.2% | +5.0% |
| Deadly Cover-Up | Sorcery | 5 | 7 | 75.0% | 70.0% | +5.0% |
| Anoint with Affliction | Instant | 2 | 15 | 74.2% | 69.4% | +4.8% |
| Deep-Cavern Bat | Creature — Bat | 2 | 7 | 74.4% | 69.7% | +4.7% |
| Kaito, Bane of Nightmares | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 4 | 8 | 73.9% | 69.4% | +4.5% |
| Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 11 | 74.3% | 70.0% | +4.4% |
| Enduring Curiosity | Enchantment Creature — Cat Glimmer | 4 | 8 | 73.9% | 69.8% | +4.1% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 1117 | 54.2% | 50.9% |
| Golgari Midrange | 134 | 17.3% | 40.3% |
| Dimir Bounce | 114 | 23.2% | 37.0% |
| Golgari Demons | 105 | 19.3% | 53.8% |
| Esper Pixie | 58 | 3.8% | 52.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.