Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Orzhov Pixie | arturcosta | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Mono Black Demons | brunoprince | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Golgari Midrange | aleister95 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Orzhov Pixie | bernardocssa | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
elvin7 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Abzan Midrange , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Midrange , Esper Midrange , Golgari Demons , Golgari Doubling , Golgari Midrange
Archfiend of the Dross ranks #253 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 75%).
Black average: 60.1%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Archfiend of the Dross is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 12.22 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 68.6%. Archfiend of the Dross has a win rate of 73.3%, making it 6.9% better than other 4-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Grim Bauble | Artifact | 9 | 75.1% | 4 |
Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 6 | 73.4% | 3 |
Royal Treatment | Instant | 29 | 71.0% | 11 |
Analyze the Pollen | Sorcery | 10 | 67.0% | 1 |
Spell Pierce | Instant | 9 | 66.7% | 3 |
Tinybones Joins Up | Legendary Enchantment | 7 | 66.7% | 3 |
Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 103 | 64.6% | 36 |
Nurturing Pixie | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 9 | 64.5% | 4 |
Debris Beetle | Artifact — Vehicle | 13 | 64.4% | 3 |
Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 7 | 63.5% | 1 |
Cards that perform better with Archfiend of the Dross than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The End | Instant | 4 | 6 | 81.6% | 71.5% | +10.1% |
Shoot the Sheriff | Instant | 2 | 10 | 77.8% | 71.1% | +6.6% |
Gix's Command | Sorcery | 5 | 16 | 77.0% | 70.7% | +6.3% |
Harvester of Misery | Creature — Spirit | 5 | 14 | 76.3% | 70.1% | +6.2% |
Llanowar Elves | Creature — Elf Druid | 1 | 12 | 76.2% | 70.1% | +6.2% |
Mosswood Dreadknight | Creature — Human Knight // Sorcery — Adventure | 2 | 13 | 76.2% | 70.2% | +6.1% |
Anoint with Affliction | Instant | 2 | 17 | 75.8% | 70.3% | +5.5% |
Tear Asunder | Instant | 2 | 15 | 75.8% | 70.5% | +5.4% |
Maelstrom Pulse | Sorcery | 3 | 15 | 75.8% | 70.6% | +5.3% |
Nissa, Ascended Animist | Legendary Planeswalker — Nissa | 7 | 13 | 76.2% | 71.5% | +4.7% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Golgari Demons | 384 | 70.5% | 46.2% |
Golgari Midrange | 219 | 28.3% | 48.8% |
Mono Black Demons | 77 | 79.4% | 37.3% |
Dimir Demons | 58 | 56.9% | 52.0% |
Orzhov Demons | 25 | 89.3% | 39.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.